Commercial Bank: CECL Model Validation A commercial bank required an independent validation of its CECL models. The models are embedded into three platforms (Trepp, Impairment Studio and Evolv) and included the following: Trepp Default Model (Trepp DM) is used by the Bank to estimate the PD, LGD and EL of the CRE portfolio Moody’s ImpairmentStudio Read More.. https://riskspan.com/ny-based-full-service-commercial-bank-cecl-model-validation/ A commercial bank required an independent validation of its CECL models. The models are embedded into three platforms (Trepp, Impairment Studio and Evolv) and included the following: Trepp Default Model (Trepp DM) is used by the Bank to estimate the PD, LGD and EL of the CRE portfolio Moody’s ImpairmentStudio – Lifetime Loss Rate (LLR) Model is used to calculate the Lifetime Loss Rate for the C&I portfolio EVOLV – Lifetime Loss Rate (LLR) model is used to calculate the Lifetime Loss Rate for Capital Call and Venture Capital loans within the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) segment, Non-rated Commercial loans, Consumer as well as Municipal loans EVOLV – Base Loss Rate (BLR) model is used to calculate quantitative allowance for 1-4 Family commercial loans and Personal loans for commercial use within the C&I segment Residential loans, HELOC and Indirect vehicle. The Solution Because the CECL models are embedded into three platforms, RiskSpan conducted an independent, comprehensive validation of all three platforms. Our validation included components typical of a full-scope model validation, focusing on a conceptual soundness review, process verification and outcomes analysis. Deliverables RiskSpan was given access to the models’ platforms, and workpapers, along with the models’ development documentation, and weekly Q&A sessions with the model owners. Our review evaluated: i. the business requirements and purpose of the model, and the metrics that used by the developer to select the best model and evaluate its success in meeting these requirements will be judged. ii. the identification and justification for (a) any theoretical basis for the model structure; (b) the use of specific developmental data; (c) the use of any statistical or econometric technique to estimate the model; and (d) the criteria used to identify and select the best model among alternatives. iii. the reasonableness of model-development decisions, documented assumptions, data adjustments, and model-performance criteria as measured at the time of development. iv. Process verification to determine the accuracy of data transcription, adjustment, transformation and model code. RiskSpan produced a written validation report detailing its validation assessments, tests, and findings, and providing a summary assessment of the suitability of the models for their intended uses as an input to the bank’s CECL process, based upon the Conceptual Soundness Review and Process Verification.