Linkedin    Twitter   Facebook

Get Started
Log In

Linkedin

Blog Archives
Home / Blog Archives

What is SOFR and What Does it Mean For You?

What is SOFR

The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) is a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. As such, it will reflect an economic cost of lending and borrowing relevant to the wide array of market participants active in the financial markets. However, SOFR is fundamentally different from LIBOR. SOFR is an overnight, secured, nearly risk-free rate, while LIBOR is an unsecured rate published at several different maturities. It is a fully transaction-based rate incorporating data from transactions across three segments of the U.S. Treasury Repo market (tri-party repo, General Collateral Finance (GCF) repo and bilateral repo cleared through the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC)).[1]

The ARRC noted the need for replacement rate spreads due to the differences between rates:

Because LIBOR is unsecured and therefore includes an element of bank credit risk, it is likely to be higher than SOFR and prone to widen when there is severe credit market stress. In contrast, because SOFR is secured and nearly risk-free, it is expected to be lower than LIBOR and may stay flat (or potentially even tighten) in periods of severe credit stress. Market participants are considering certain adjustments, referenced in the fallback proposal as the applicable ‘Replacement Benchmark Spread’, which would be intended to mitigate some of the differences between LIBOR and SOFR.[2]

While the ARRC selection of SOFR as the U.S. replacement rate of choice is final, their selection is only a recommendation that LIBOR be replaced with SOFR. This creates a precarious outlook for the transition: financial institutions have to choose to take the transition seriously, and if they choose to employ rates other than SOFR, the transition could be longer and more complicated than many expect. That said, the cost benefit of choosing a different alternative reference rate is increasingly difficult to justify. With the selection of SOFR as the recommended rate, the New York Fed established an industry standard and did so in a lengthy process that included market participants and a public comment period. They also began publishing SOFR regularly on April 3, 2018.[3]
 

Additional steps taken by government–sponsored enterprises (GSEs) have initiated the momentum in building out the SOFR market. In July 2018, Fannie Mae issued the first SOFR-denominated securities, leading the way for other institutions who have since followed suit.  In November 2018, the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs) issued $4bn in debt tied to SOFR. The action was taken to support liquidity and help demonstrate SOFR demand to develop the SOFR market for the approximately 7,000 member institutions – banks, credit unions, and insurers – who are in the process of transitioning away from LIBOR.[4] CME Group, a derivatives and futures exchange company, launched 3-month and 1-month SOFR futures contracts in 2018.[5] All of these steps taken to build out the market create a strong start for a rate that is already more stable than LIBOR—the transaction volume underpinning SOFR rates is around $750 billon daily, compared to USD LIBOR’s estimated $500 million.[6]

The ARRC has begun publishing guidance for fallback language and in the fall of 2018 published consultations on recommended language for floating rate notes and syndicated business loans.[7][8]

These initial steps to build out the necessary SOFR market put the United States ahead of the ARRC transition plan schedule and position the market well to begin SOFR implementation. However, a successful transition will require extensive engagement from other institutions. Affected institutions need to begin their transition now in order to make the gradual transition in time for the 2021 deadline.

Who Does This Transition Affect?

The transition affects any institutions that hold contracts, products, or tools that reference LIBOR and will not reach full maturity or phase out before the end of 2021. 

What Actions Do Affected Institutions Need to Take?

  1. Establish a Sponsor and Project Team:  Affected institutions need to take a phased approach to the transition away from LIBOR. Because of the need for continuous oversight, they should begin by identifying an executive sponsor and establishing a project team. The team should be responsible for all transition-related activities across the organization, including assessment of exposure and the applicability of alternative reference rates where necessary, planning the steps and timing of transition, and coordinating the implementation of transition away from LIBOR.
  2. Conduct an Impact Assessment:  The first task of the project team is to complete an impact assessment to determine the institution’s LIBOR exposure across all financial products and existing contracts that mature after 2021, as well as any related models and business processes (including third-party vendors and data providers). Regarding contracts, the team should identify and categorize all variants of legacy fallback language in existing contracts. Additionally, the assessment should analyze the risk of the LIBOR transition to the institution’s basis and operational risk and across financial holdings.
  3. Mitigate Risks:  Using results from the LIBOR exposure assessment, the project team should develop a plan running through 2021 to prioritize transition activities in a way that best mitigates risk on LIBOR exposure, and communicates the transition activities to employees and clients with ample time for them to learn about and buy into the transition objectives. 

  4. Prepare new products and tools linked to alternative reference rates: This mitigates risk by limiting the number of legacy exposures that will still be in effect in 2021 and creates a clear direction for transition activities. New references may include financial instruments and products, contract language, models, pricing, risk, operational and technological processes and applications to support the new rates.
  5. Develop and Implement Transition Contract Terms: In legacy contracts that will mature after 2021, the project team will need to amend contracts and fallback language. The ARRC has begun to provide guidance for amendments or transitions related to some financial products and will continue to publish legacy transition guidance as it fulfills its mandate. Where necessary, products must move to ARRs.
  6. Update Business Processes: Based on the impact assessment, various business processes surrounding the management of interest rate changes, including those built into models and systems will require updating to accommodate the switch away from LIBOR. For new products utilizing the new index rate, procedures, processes and policies will need to be established and tested before rollout to clients.

  7. Manage Change and Communicate:  The project team will need to develop educational materials explaining specific changes and their impacts to stakeholders. The materials must be distributed as part of an outreach strategy to external stakeholders, including clients and investors, as well as rating agencies and regulatory bodies. The outreach strategy should help to ensure that the transition message is consistent and clear as it is communicated from executives and board members to operational personnel, other stakeholders and outer spheres of influence. 

  8. Test: Financial institutions will want to prepare for regulatory oversight by testing business processes in advance. Regulators may look for documentation of the processes used to identify and remediate LIBOR risks and any risk exposure that has not been completed.

1Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Secured Overnight Financing Rate Data.” https://apps.newyorkfed.org/markets/autorates/sofr, Accessed November 2018.

2 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “ARRC Consultation: Regarding more robust LIBOR fallback contract language for new originations of LIBOR syndicated business loans,” 24 September 2018. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2018/ARRC-Syndicated-Business-Loans-Consultation.pdf, Accessed November 2018.

3 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Statement Introducing the Treasury Repo Reference Rates,” 3 April 2018. https://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/opolicy/operating_policy_180403, Accessed November 2018.

4Guida, Victoria. “Federal Home Loan Banks boost LIBOR replacement with $4B debt issuance,” Politico. 13 November 2018. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/13/federal-home-loan-banks-libor-replacement-939489, Accessed November 2018.

5 CME Group. “Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Futures.” https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/secured-overnight-financing-rate-futures.html, Accessed November 2018.

6 Graph: LSTA. “LIBOR and the Loan Market.” 24 April 2018. https://www.lsta.org/uploads/DocumentModel/3523/file/libor-in-the-loan-market_042418.pdf, Accessed November 2018.

7 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “ARRC Consultation: Regarding more robust LIBOR fallback contract language for new issuances of LIBOR floating rate notes,” 24 September 2018. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2018/ARRC-FRN-Consultation.pdf, Accessed November 2018.

8 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “ARRC Consultation: Regarding more robust LIBOR fallback contract language for new originations of LIBOR syndicated business loans,” 24 September 2018. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2018/ARRC-Syndicated-Business-Loans-Consultation.pdf, Accessed November 2018.

16 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Minutes,” Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC). 31 October 2017. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/microsites/arrc/files/2017/October-31-2017-ARRC-minutes.pdf, Accessed November 2018.

Case Study: RS Edge – Analytics and Risk

The Client

Large Life Insurance Company – Investment Group

 

The Problem

The Client was shopping around for an analytics and risk platform to be used by both the trading desk and risk managers.

RiskSpan Edge Platform enabled highly scalable analytics and risk modeling providing visibility and control to address investment analysis, risk surveillance, stress testing and compliance requirements.

The Solution

Initially, the solution was intended for both the trading desk (as pre-trade analysis) as well as risk management (running scenarios on the existing portfolio).  Ultimately, the system was used exclusively by risk management and used heavily by mid-level risk management. 

Cloud Native Risk Service

We have transformed portfolio risk analytics through distributed cloud computing. Our optimized infrastructure powers risk and scenario analytics at speed and cost never before possible in the industry.

Perform advanced portfolio analysis to achieve risk oversight and regulatory compliance with confidence. Access reliable results with cloud-native interactive dashboards that satisfy investors, regulators, and clients.

Two Flexible Options
Fund Subscriber Service + Managed Service

Each deployment option includes on-demand analytics, standard batch and over-night processing or a hybrid model to suit your specific business needs. Our team will work with customers to customize deployment and delivery formats, including investor-specific reporting requirements.

Easy Integration + Delivery
Access Your Risk

Accessing the results of your risk run is easy via several different supported delivery channels. We can accommodate your specific needs – whether you’re a new hedge fund, fund-of-funds, bank or other Enterprise-scale customer.

“We feel the integration of RiskSpan into our toolkit will enhance portfolio management’s trading capabilities as well as increase the efficiency and scalability of the downstream RMBS analysis processes.  We found RiskSpan’s offering to be user-friendly, providing a strong integration of market / vendor data backed by a knowledgeable and responsive support team.”

The Deliverables

  • Enabled running various HPI scenarios and tweaked the credit model knobs to change the default curve, running a portfolio of a couple hundred non-agency RMBS
  • Scaling the processing power up/down via the cloud, and they would iterate through runs, changing conditions until they got the risk numbers they needed
  • Simplified integration into their risk reporting system, external to RiskSpan

Case Study: Securitization Disclosure File Creation Process

The Client

Private Label Mortgage-Backed Security Issuer 

The Problem

The client issues private label MBS with sources from multiple origination channels. In accordance with industry requirements, the client needed to create and make available to securitization counterparties a loan-level data file (the “ASF File”) which has been defined and endorsed by the Structured Finance Industry Group. ​

The process of extraction and aggregation was inefficient and inconsistent with data from various originators, due diligence vendors and service providers.

RiskSpan consulting services streamlined extraction and aggregation, and reconciling the data used in this process.

The Solution

RiskSpan automated and improved the client’s processes to aggregate loan level data and perform data quality business rules. RiskSpan also designed, built, tested, and delivered an automated process to perform quality control business rules and produce the ASF File, while producing a reconciled file meeting ASF File standards and specifications.

Data Lineage

RiskSpan has experience working with various financial institutions on data lineage and its best practices. RiskSpan has also partnered with industry-leading data lineage solution providers to harness technical solutions for data lineage.

Data Quality

It’s increasingly important to reduce inefficiency in the data process and one of the key criteria to achieve the same is to ensure Data is of highest quality for downstream or any other analytical application usage. Riskspan experience in data quality stems from working with raw loan and transactional data from some of the world’s largest financial institutions.

The Deliverables

  • Created and documented data dictionary, data mapping, business procedures and business flows​
  • Gathered criteria and knowledge, from various client departments, to assess the reasonableness of data used in the securitization process ​
  • Documented client-specific business logic and business rules to reduce resource dependency and increase organizational transparency​
  • Enforced business rules through an automated mechanism, reducing manual effort and data scrub process time​
  • Delivered exception reporting which enabled the client to track, measure and report inaccuracies in data from due diligence firm​
  • Eliminated maintenance and dependency on ad hoc data sources and manual work-arounds​

What is LIBOR and why is it Going Away?

What is LIBOR?

The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is a reference rate, and over time since the 1980s has become the dominant rate for most adjustable-rate financial products. A group of banks (panel banks) voluntarily report the estimated transaction cost for unsecured bank-to-bank borrowing terms ranging from overnight to one year for various currencies.

The number of currencies and maturities has fluctuated over time, but LIBOR is currently produced across seven maturities: overnight/spot, one week, one month, two months, three months, six months and one year. LIBOR rates are produced for the American dollar, the British pound sterling, the European euro, Japanese yen, and the Swiss franc, resulting in the current 35 rates.[1][2] The aggregated calculations behind the rates are supposed to reflect the average of what banks believe they would have to pay to borrow currency or the cost of funds for a specified period. However, because the contributions are voluntary, and the rates submitted are a subjective assessment of probable cost, LIBOR indices do not reflect actual transactions.

LIBOR rates became heavily used in trading in the 1980s, officially launched by the British Bankers Association (BBA) in 1986 and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the independent UK body that regulates financial firms, since April 2013.[3] Until 2014, LIBOR was developed by a group of UK banks, under the BBA. The Intercontinental Exchange Benchmark Administration (ICE) took over administration of the rate in 2014 in an effort to give the rate credible internal governance and oversight – ICE created third-party oversight, which resolved the BBA’s inherent conflict of interest in generating a sound rate while also protecting its member institutions.

Why is LIBOR Going Away?

International investigations into LIBOR began in 2012 and revealed widespread efforts to manipulate the rates for profit, with issues discovered as far back as 2003. The investigations resulted in billions of dollars in fines for involved banks globally and jail time for some traders. More recently, in October 2018, a Deutsche Bank trading supervisor and derivatives trader were convicted of conspiracy and wire fraud in relation to LIBOR rigging.[4]

The scandal challenged the validity of LIBOR and deterred panel banks from continuing their involvement in LIBOR generation. Because LIBOR rates are collected by voluntary contribution, the number of banks contributing, and therefore also the number of underlying transactions, have waned in recent years. In July 2017, Andrew Bailey, Chief Executive of the FCA announced that LIBOR rates would only be formally sustained by the FCA through the end of 2021, due to limited market activity around LIBOR benchmarks and the declining contributions of panel banks. The FCA has negotiated with current panel banks for their agreement to continue contributing data towards LIBOR rate generation through the end of 2021.[5]

Even without the challenge of collecting contributions from panel banks, many regulators have expressed concerns with the representative scale of LIBOR and related issues of instability. The market of products referencing LIBOR dwarfs the transactions that LIBOR is supposed to represent. The New York Fed approximated that underlying transaction volumes for USD LIBOR range from $250 million to $500 million, while exposure for USD LIBOR as of the end of 2016 was nearly $200 trillion.[6]

What Solution are Regulators Proposing?

In 2014, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (New York Fed) convened the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC) in order to identify best practices for alternative reference rates and contract robustness, develop an adoption plan, and create an implementation plan with metrics of success and a timeline. The Committee was created in the wake of the LIBOR scandals, with the intention of verifying some alternatives, though no formal change in LIBOR was announced until 2017. The Federal Reserve reconstituted this board to include a broader set of market participants in March 2018 with the updated objective of developing a transition plan away from LIBOR and providing guidance on how affected parties can address risks in legacy contracts language that reference LIBOR.

In June 2017, the ARRC announced the Secure Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its recommended alternative rate, and the New York Fed began publishing the rate on April 3, 2018. In October 2017, the ARRC adopted a “Paced Transition Plan” with specific steps and timelines designed to encourage use of its recommended rate.[7]

The transition away from LIBOR impacts most institutions dealing in floating rate instruments. Stay updated with the RiskSpan blog for future LIBOR updates.

Footnotes

1 Kiff, John. “Back to Basics: What is LIBOR?” International Monetary Fund. Accessed November 2018. December 2012. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2012/12/basics.htm, Accessed November 2018.

2 “LIBOR – current LIBOR interest rates.” Global Rates. https://www.global-rates.com/interest-rates/libor/libor.aspx, Accessed November 2018.

3 Bailey, Andrew. “The Future of LIBOR.” Financial Conduct Authority. 27 July 2017. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/the-future-of-libor, Accessed November 2018

4 “Two Former Deutsche Bank Traders Convicted for Role in Scheme to Manipulate a Critical Global Benchmark Interest Rate.” U.S. Department of Justice press release. 17 October 2018. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-former-deutsche-bank-traders-convicted-role-scheme-manipulate-critical-global-benchmark, Accessed November 2018.

5 Bailey, Andrew. “The Future of LIBOR.” Financial Conduct Authority. 27 July 2017. https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/the-future-of-libor, Accessed November 2018.

6 Alternative Reference Rates Committee. “Second Report.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York. March 2018. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/2018/ARRC-Second-report, Accessed November 2018.

7 Alternative Reference Rates Committee. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://www.newyorkfed.org/arrc/index.html, Accessed November 2018.

Asset Manager: Cost-Efficient and Flexible Solution

An asset management company needed to replace an inflexible risk system provided by a Wall Street dealer.  The client’s portfolio was diverse, with a sizable concentration in structured securities and mortgage assets. The legacy analytics system was rigid with no flexibility to vary scenarios or critical investor and regulatory reporting.

Every portfolio manager requires reliable and accurate analytics to manage risk and improve investment decisions. They require understanding of investment positions and the impacts on risk metrics measures such as value at risk (VaR). The faster they can assess a portfolio’s total exposure and understand the key drivers, the better they can react and align activities with the overall firm risk appetite.

“The challenge was that our existing daily process for calculating, validating and reporting market and credit risk metrics required significant manual work. If we could get to the answers faster, we would be in a much better position to identify exposures and address potential problems.”                             

The Solution

As a fully-managed solution, RiskSpan’s Edge Platform provides the asset manager with a cost-efficient and flexible solution. The service bundles required data feeds, infrastructure management, and predictive models for mortgages and structured products. Edge manages and validates third-party data as well as client portfolio data, and produces scenario analytics in a secure hosted environment. With the combination of models, data management, and an end-to-end managed process, Edge provides the asset manager with unmatched value.

The Benefits

  • Portfolio risk measures on-demand
  • Structured product expertise
  • Outsourced data management
  • Predictive models for mortgages
  • Outsourced hardware management
  • Customized dashboards and reports

The asset manager used the Edge Platform to cut hours from daily risk-reporting processes and free several analysts to focus on their primary task: optimizing analytics and processes that support better investment decisions.

Deliverables

Analytics Software

The Edge Platform provides for the calculation of key market risk metrics for over 70 different instrument types. The service provides for a combination of on-demand or overnight batch processing. Users have online access to platform to run ad-hoc analyses, including additional scenarios or what-if analyses. The hosted platform makes the processing speed lightning fast.

Data Management Outsourced

The Edge market-risk analytics platform integrates data from six major data vendors.  Our data management services support integrated data for interest-rates, implied volatility, and terms & conditions for over 70 different instrument types. The platform includes loan-level data for Agency and non-Agency mortgage-backed products. The platform integrates seamlessly with Intex subroutines to support all structured products.  Further, Edge clients have access to a team of experts in mortgage and structured product – not just technical support.

Technology and Infrastructure Management

As a hosted solution, the asset manager is able to leave management of hardware to the Edge technology team. We secure and manage all required hardware, freeing up millions of dollars in hardware acquisition costs and labor costs required to manage the infrastructure.

RiskSpan Partners with S&P Global Market Intelligence

ARLINGTON, Va., December 5, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — Virginia-based modeling and analytics SaaS vendor RiskSpan announced today that it will be partnering with S&P Global Market Intelligence to expand the capabilities of its commercially-available RS Edge Platform.

RS Edge is a SaaS platform that integrates normalized loan and securities data, predictive models and complex scenario analytics for commercial banks, credit unions, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. The RS Edge Platform solves the hardest data management and analytical problem – affordable off-the-shelf integration of clean data and reliable models.

RiskSpan’s CECL module features broad-based methodologies covering all loan types and security types. The integration of S&P Global Market Intelligence’s C&I and CRE CECL models, built on 36 years of default and recovery data, adds loan-level, econometric models for these major asset classes from a globally recognized credit ratings institution. These enhancements further equip RiskSpan clients to navigate FASB’s impending CECL standard as well as IFRS 9 requirements.

“We’re very excited to leverage S&P Global Market Intelligence’s CECL credit models and methodologies on our SaaS platform” said RiskSpan CEO Bernadette Kogler. “Coupled with RiskSpan’s technology capabilities and risk management expertise, our CECL solution is set up to provide unmatched value to the market.”

Bob Durante, Senior Director of Risk Solutions at S&P Global Market Intelligence added, “We are pleased to offer our CECL credit models through partners such as RiskSpan. This partnership brings our best of breed CECL models directly through RiskSpan to a wide array of customers in the commercial banking, community banking, and insurance industries.”

Learn more about our CECL module here.

Get a Demo

About RiskSpan

RiskSpan simplifies the management of complex data and models in the capital markets, commercial banking, and insurance industries. We transform seemingly unmanageable loan data and securities data into productive business analytics.

About S&P Global Market Intelligence

At S&P Global Market Intelligence, we know that not all information is important—some of it is vital. Accurate, deep and insightful. We integrate financial and industry data, research and news into tools that help track performance, generate alpha, identify investment ideas, understand competitive and industry dynamics, perform valuations and assess credit risk. Investment professionals, government agencies, corporations and universities globally can gain the intelligence essential to making business and financial decisions with conviction.

S&P Global Market Intelligence a division of S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI), provides essential intelligence for individuals, companies and governments to make decisions with confidence. For more information, visit www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence.

RiskSpan Ranks in Chartis Research RiskTech 100 2019

RiskSpan is excited to announce we have ranked on the RiskTech 100 report by Chartis Research. This represents a notable rise of fourteen spots compared to 2018. The Chartis RiskTech 100 analyzes firms in the risk technology space, and serves as one of the most trusted reports for clear and reliable information about the risktech space and the exciting new developments coming out of it. This jump in the rankings represents one of the largest gains in this year’s report, and reflects RiskSpan’s focus on applying innovative technology to our core offerings. RiskSpan provides a data, modeling, and analytics Platform and Services to the finance industry – including the commercial banking, insurance, and capital markets sub-segments. Our flagship data/modeling/forecasting/valuation software, the RiskSpan Edge Platform, is a cloud-native system for hosting loan and fixed-income securities data, performing historical and predictive analytics/forecasting, and generating explanatory reports and data visualizations. RS Edge is a SaaS platform that integrates normalized data, predictive models and complex scenario analytics for customers in the capital markets, commercial banking, and insurance industries. The Edge Platform solves the hardest data management and analytical problem – affordable off-the-shelf integration of clean data and reliable models.  

Get a Demo

For over a decade, RiskSpan has been the consulting services vendor of choice for large banking, insurance, and capital markets participants. RiskSpan data scientists, technologists, and quants have handled data management, model development, and model validation, and we have adapted our products to the mid-sized and small commercial banking and insurance sectors. talk scope risktech 100 Interested in learning more about our platform and services? Get in touch today.

Risk-as-a-Service – Transforming Portfolio Market Risk Analytics

Watch RiskSpan Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer, Suhrud Dagli, discuss RiskSpan’s Risk-as-a-Service offerings. RiskSpan’s market risk management team has transformed portfolio risk analytics through distributed cloud computing. Our optimized infrastructure powers risk and scenario analytics at speeds and costs never before possible in the industry. Still want more? Take a look at our portfolio market risk analytics page.

CRT Exposure to Hurricane Michael

Graph

With Hurricane Michael approaching the Gulf Coast, we put together some interactive charts looking at the affected metro areas, and their related CRT exposure (Both CAS and STACR). Given the large area of impact with Hurricane Michael, we have included a nearly exhaustive selection of MSA’s. Click on a deal ID along the left-hand side of the plot to view its exposure to each MSA. Most of the mortgage delinquencies in the wake of Hurricane Harvey quickly cured. Holders of securities backed by loans that ultimately defaulted (typically because the property was completely destroyed) had much of their exposure mitigated by insurance proceeds, government intervention, and other relief provisions.  





Analytics-as-a-Service – CECL Forecasting

The RiskSpan Edge Platform CECL Module delivers the technology platform and expertise to take you from where you are today to producing audit-ready CECL estimates. Our dedicated CECL Module executes your monthly loss reserving and reporting process under the new CECL standard, covering data intake, segmentation, modeling, and report generation within a single platform. Watch RiskSpan Director David Andrukonis explain the Edge CECL Module in this video.

 

Get a Demo

Logo

Company

Products

Security & Compliance

Amazon Web Services
Microsoft

Linkedin

SOC2 Type II Certified

Get Started
Log in

Linkedin   

risktech2024